Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 222
Filtrar
1.
J Natl Med Assoc ; 115(2): 101-118, 2023 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36775786

RESUMO

The purpose of our study is to examine the barriers and facilitators for urban African American students interested in pursuing health professions careers in the Midwest. In our analysis of the key informant interviews and focus groups, we identified four barriers (lack of preparation, lack of funding, lack of support/isolation, and perceived discrimination) and three facilitators (early preparation, support/mentorship, funding). We provide recommendations for how to leverage these facilitators and address the barriers to increase the representation of African Americans in the healthcare workforce. Novel future directions for this work should include comprehensive interventions tailored to URM students that span the health professions education pipeline and begin as early as elementary school. Interventions that engage mentors should take place at high school, undergraduate, and graduate health professions school levels.


Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano , Escolha da Profissão , Diversidade, Equidade, Inclusão , Ocupações em Saúde , Estudantes , Humanos , Negro ou Afro-Americano/psicologia , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Ocupações em Saúde/educação , Ocupações em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Grupos Minoritários/educação , Grupos Minoritários/psicologia , Grupos Minoritários/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudantes/psicologia , Estudantes/estatística & dados numéricos , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos , Meio-Oeste dos Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
2.
Nurse Educ Pract ; 66: 103532, 2023 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36563599

RESUMO

AIM: This study explored the lived experiences of racial bias for Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic students undertaking an undergraduate or post-graduate degree in nursing, midwifery and allied health courses in the United Kingdom. BACKGROUND: Previous research indicates that students from Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic groups have fewer opportunities to succeed at university and this has brought about a race awarding gap in their degree attainment. The reasons for this awarding gap are complex and multi-factorial and it is crucial that the lived experiences of racial bias are explored from the student perspective. DESIGN: A hermeneutic phenomenological approach was adopted to elicit individual and collective experiences in the practice environment, a mandatory component of the student's degree. METHODS: A focus group and individual semi-structured interviews were conducted to collect data from sixteen participants and analysed using thematic analysis RESULTS: Three encompassing themes were identified which included a sense of not belonging, trauma impact on mental health and understanding covert and overt racism. Participants reported incidences of racism and appeared to be traumatised by their experiences within practice and the university. They also reported poor mental health and well-being as shared experiences and a lack of confidence in the university and practice to mitigate racial issues. CONCLUSIONS: Meaningful action must be taken by universities and practice partners to advance racial inequality initiatives by having robust anti-racism action plans and processes. These should be co-created with students and staff to reduce the race awarding gap.


Assuntos
Povo Asiático , População Negra , Ocupações em Saúde , Grupos Minoritários , Racismo , Estudantes , Humanos , Hermenêutica , Grupos Minoritários/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Racismo/etnologia , Racismo/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudantes/estatística & dados numéricos , População Negra/estatística & dados numéricos , Povo Asiático/estatística & dados numéricos , Enfermagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Ocupações Relacionadas com Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Tocologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Ocupações em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
Occup Environ Med ; 79(3): 176-183, 2022 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34462304

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To quantify occupational risks of COVID-19 among healthcare staff during the first wave (9 March 2020-31 July 2020) of the pandemic in England. METHODS: We used pseudonymised data on 902 813 individuals employed by 191 National Health Service trusts to explore demographic and occupational risk factors for sickness absence ascribed to COVID-19 (n=92 880). We estimated ORs by multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: With adjustment for employing trust, demographic characteristics and previous frequency of sickness absence, risk relative to administrative/clerical occupations was highest in 'additional clinical services' (care assistants and other occupations directly supporting those in clinical roles) (OR 2.31 (2.25 to 2.37)), registered nursing and midwifery professionals (OR 2.28 (2.23 to 2.34)) and allied health professionals (OR 1.94 (1.88 to 2.01)) and intermediate in doctors and dentists (OR 1.55 (1.50 to 1.61)). Differences in risk were higher after the employing trust had started to care for documented patients with COVID-19, and were reduced, but not eliminated, following additional adjustment for exposure to infected patients or materials, assessed by a job-exposure matrix. For prolonged COVID-19 sickness absence (episodes lasting >14 days), the variation in risk by staff group was somewhat greater. CONCLUSIONS: After allowance for possible bias and confounding by non-occupational exposures, we estimated that relative risks for COVID-19 among most patient-facing occupations were between 1.5 and 2.5. The highest risks were in those working in additional clinical services, nursing and midwifery and in allied health professions. Better protective measures for these staff groups should be a priority. COVID-19 may meet criteria for compensation as an occupational disease in some healthcare occupations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN36352994.


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Ocupações em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoal de Saúde , Exposição Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Licença Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , SARS-CoV-2 , Medicina Estatal
4.
CMAJ Open ; 9(3): E848-E854, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34493551

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: When vaccine supplies are anticipated to be limited, necessitating the vaccination of certain groups earlier than others, the assessment of values and preferences of stakeholders is an important component of an ethically sound vaccine prioritization framework. The objective of this study was to conduct a priority-setting exercise to establish an expert stakeholder perspective on the relative importance of COVID-19 vaccination strategies in Canada. METHODS: The priority-setting exercise included a survey of stakeholders that was conducted from July 22 to Aug. 14, 2020. Stakeholders included clinical and public health expert groups, provincial and territorial committees and national Indigenous groups, patient and community advocacy representatives and experts, health professional associations and federal government departments. Survey results were analyzed to identify trends. RESULTS: Of 155 stakeholders contacted, 76 surveys were received for a participation rate of 49%. During a period of anticipated initial vaccine scarcity for all pandemic scenarios, stakeholders generally considered the most important vaccination strategy to be protecting those who are most vulnerable to severe illness and death from COVID-19. This was followed in importance by strategies to protect health care capacity, minimize transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and protect critical infrastructure. INTERPRETATION: This priority-setting exercise established that there is general alignment in the values and preferences across stakeholder groups: the most important vaccination strategy at the time of limited initial vaccine availability is to protect those who are most vulnerable. The findings of this priority-setting exercise provided a timely expert perspective to guide early public health planning for COVID-19 vaccines.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Prioridades em Saúde/ética , Vacinação/métodos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/virologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/provisão & distribuição , Canadá/epidemiologia , Fortalecimento Institucional/organização & administração , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa/prevenção & controle , Ocupações em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Ocupações em Saúde/tendências , Prioridades em Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Saúde Pública/legislação & jurisprudência , SARS-CoV-2/genética , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Participação dos Interessados , Inquéritos e Questionários/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Populações Vulneráveis
7.
Acad Med ; 96(2): 218-225, 2021 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32590472

RESUMO

Learning environments shape the experiences of learners and practitioners, making them an important component of program evaluation. However, educators find it challenging to decide whether to measure clinical learning environments with existing instruments or to design their own new instrument and, if using an existing instrument, which to choose. To assist educators with these decisions, the authors compared clinical learning environment instruments based on their characteristics, underlying constructs, and degree to which items reflect 4 domains (personal, social, organizational, material) from a recently developed model for conceptualizing learning environments in the health professions. Building on 3 prior literature reviews as well as a literature search, the authors identified 6 clinically oriented learning environment instruments designed for medical education. They collected key information about each instrument (e.g., number of items and subscales, conceptual frameworks, operational definitions of the learning environment) and coded items from each instrument according to the 4 domains. The 6 instruments varied in number of items, underlying constructs, subscales, definitions of clinical learning environment, and domain coverage. Most instruments focused heavily on the organizational and social domains and less on the personal and material domains (half omitted the material domain entirely). The variations in these instruments suggest that educators might consider several guiding questions. How will they define the learning environment and which theoretical lens is most applicable (e.g., personal vitality, sociocultural learning theory)? What aspects or domains of the learning environment do they most wish to capture (e.g., personal support, social interactions, organizational culture, access to resources)? How comprehensive do they want the instrument to be (and correspondingly how much time do they expect people to devote to completing the instrument and how frequently)? Whose perspective do they wish to evaluate (e.g., student, resident, fellow, attending, team, patient)? Each of these considerations is addressed.


Assuntos
Medicina Clínica/instrumentação , Educação Médica/métodos , Avaliação Educacional/métodos , Aprendizagem/fisiologia , Formação de Conceito , Feminino , Ocupações em Saúde/educação , Ocupações em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos em Saúde/provisão & distribuição , Humanos , Masculino , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/métodos , Interação Social , Apoio Social , Estudantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Vitalismo/psicologia
8.
Acad Med ; 96(3): 402-408, 2021 03 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33239533

RESUMO

PURPOSE: As global health education and training shift toward competency-based approaches, academic institutions and organizations must define appropriate assessment strategies for use across health professions. The authors aim to develop entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for global health to apply across academic and workplace settings. METHOD: In 2019, the authors invited 55 global health experts from medicine, nursing, pharmacy, and public health to participate in a multiround, online Delphi process; 30 (55%) agreed. Experts averaged 17 years of global health experience, and 12 (40%) were from low- to middle-income countries. In round one, participants listed essential global health activities. The authors used in vivo coding for round one responses to develop initial EPA statements. In subsequent rounds, participants used 5-point Likert-type scales to evaluate EPA statements for importance and relevance to global health across health professions. The authors elevated statements that were rated 4 (important/relevant to most) or 5 (very important/relevant to all) by a minimum of 70% of participants (decided a priori) to the final round, during which participants evaluated whether each statement represented an observable unit of work that could be assigned to a trainee. Descriptive statistics were used for quantitative data analysis. The authors used participant comments to categorize EPA statements into role domains. RESULTS: Twenty-two EPA statements reached at least 70% consensus. The authors categorized these into 5 role domains: partnership developer, capacity builder, data analyzer, equity advocate, and health promoter. Statements in the equity advocate and partnership developer domains had the highest agreement for importance and relevance. Several statements achieved 100% agreement as a unit of work but achieved lower levels of agreement regarding their observability. CONCLUSIONS: EPAs for global health may be useful to academic institutions and other organizations to guide the assessment of trainees within education and training programs across health professions.


Assuntos
Competência Clínica/normas , Educação Baseada em Competências/métodos , Currículo/normas , Saúde Global/educação , Competência Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Consenso , Currículo/tendências , Técnica Delfos , Avaliação Educacional/métodos , Ocupações em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Local de Trabalho/normas
10.
JAMA Netw Open ; 3(11): e2027421, 2020 11 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33231639

RESUMO

Importance: The population impact of modifying obesity and other key risk factors for hyperuricemia has been estimated in cross-sectional studies; however, the proportion of incident gout cases (a clinical end point) that could be prevented by modifying such factors has not been evaluated. Objective: To estimate the proportion of incident gout cases that could be avoided through simultaneous modification of obesity and other key risk factors. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Health Professionals Follow-up Study is a US prospective cohort study of 51 529 male health professionals enrolled in 1986 and followed up through questionnaires every 2 years through 2012. Self-reported gout cases were confirmed through June 2015. Clean and complete data used for this analysis were available in June 2016, with statistical analyses performed from July 2016 to July 2019. Exposures: From data collected in the validated questionnaires, men were categorized to low-risk groups according to combinations of the following 4 factors: normal body mass index (BMI [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared]; <25), no alcohol intake, adherence to Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH)-style diet (highest quintile of DASH diet score), and no diuretic use. Main Outcomes and Measures: Population attributable risks (PARs) for incident gout meeting the preliminary American College of Rheumatology survey criteria, overall and stratified by BMI. Results: We analyzed 44 654 men (mean [SD] age, 54.0 [9.8] years) with no history of gout at baseline. During 26 years of follow-up, 1741 (3.9%) developed incident gout. Among all participants, PAR for the 4 risk factors combined (BMI, diet, alcohol use, and diuretic use) was 77% (95% CI, 56%-88%). Among men with normal weight (BMI <25.0) and overweight (BMI 25.0-29.9), we estimated that more than half of incident gout cases (69% [95% CI, 42%-83%] and 59% [95% CI, 30%-75%], respectively) may have been prevented by the combination of DASH-style diet, no alcohol intake, and no diuretic use. However, among men with obesity (BMI ≥30), PAR was substantially lower and not significant (5% [95% CI, 0%-47%]). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study suggest that addressing excess adiposity and other key modifiable factors has the potential to prevent the majority of incident gout cases among men. Men with obesity may not benefit from other modifications unless weight loss is addressed.


Assuntos
Gota/prevenção & controle , Ocupações em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Prevenção Primária/métodos , Adulto , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/epidemiologia , Índice de Massa Corporal , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Transversais , Abordagens Dietéticas para Conter a Hipertensão/métodos , Abordagens Dietéticas para Conter a Hipertensão/psicologia , Diuréticos/efeitos adversos , Diuréticos/uso terapêutico , Seguimentos , Gota/epidemiologia , Gota/etiologia , Humanos , Hipertensão/dietoterapia , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Incidência , Estilo de Vida , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade/complicações , Obesidade/dietoterapia , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Prevenção Primária/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Autorrelato
13.
J Am Med Inform Assoc ; 27(11): 1641-1647, 2020 11 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33053157

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Biomedical informatics attracts few underrepresented racial minorities (URMs) into PhD programs. We examine graduation trends from 2002 to 2017 to determine how URM representation has changed over time. We also examine academic job placements by race and identify individual and institutional characteristics associated with URM graduates being successfully placed in academic jobs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyze a near census of all research doctoral graduates from US-accredited institutions, surveyed at graduation by the National Science Foundation Survey of Earned Doctorates. Graduates of biomedical informatics-related programs were identified using self-reported primary and secondary disciplines. Data are analyzed using bivariate and multivariable logistic regressions. RESULTS: During the study period, 2426 individuals earned doctoral degrees in biomedical informatics-related disciplines. URM students comprised nearly 12% of graduates, and this proportion did not change over time (2002-2017). URMs included Hispanic (5.7%), Black (3.2%), and others, including multi-racial and indigenous American populations (2.8%). Overall, 82.3% of all graduates accepted academic positions at the time of graduation with significantly more Hispanic graduates electing to go into academia (89.2%; P < .001). URM graduates were more likely to be single (OR = 1.38; P < .05), have a dependent (1.95; P < .01), and not receive full tuition remission (OR = 1.37; P = .05) as a student. URM graduates accepting an academic position were less likely to be a graduate of a private institution (OR = 0.70; P < .05). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The proportion of URM candidates among biomedical informatics doctoral graduates has not increased over time and remains low. In order to improve URM recruitment and retention within academia, leaders in biomedical informatics should replicate strategies used to improve URM graduation rates in other fields.


Assuntos
Educação de Pós-Graduação/estatística & dados numéricos , Informática Médica/educação , Grupos Minoritários/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Feminino , Ocupações em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Grupos Minoritários/educação , Grupos Raciais , Estados Unidos
14.
Perspect Med Educ ; 9(6): 359-366, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32930985

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: There has been a marked increase in institutional structures developed to support health professions education scholarship recently. These health professions education scholarship units (HPESUs) engage in a diverse range of activities. Previous work provided insight into factors that influence the functioning of such units, but data from European, Asian, Latin American, and African contexts was absent, potentially leading to a single world-view informing international standards for HPESUs. This aim of this study was to explore perspectives from sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) in response to this omission. METHODS: Situated within an interpretivist paradigm, the research team conducted semi-structured interviews with nine HPESU leaders in SSA, exploring how participants experienced and understood the functioning of their units. Despite efforts to have representation from across the region, most participants were from South Africa. The researchers analysed data thematically using the theory of institutional logics as an analytical frame. RESULTS: Several aspects of the HPESUs aligned with the previously identified logics of academic research, service and teaching; and of a cohesive education continuum. By contrast, leaders described financial sustainability as a more prominent logic than financial accountability. DISCUSSION: The similarities identified in this study may reflect isomorphism-a process which sees institutions within a similar field becoming more alike, particularly as newer institutions seek to acquire legitimacy within that field. An important caveat, however, is that isomorphism tends to occur across similar institutional contexts, which was not the case in this study. Understanding these differences is key as these HPESUs move to foster scholarship that can respond to the region's unique context.


Assuntos
Docentes/psicologia , Bolsas de Estudo/métodos , Ocupações em Saúde/educação , África Subsaariana , Docentes/estatística & dados numéricos , Ocupações em Saúde/normas , Ocupações em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto/métodos , Pesquisa Qualitativa
15.
J Holist Nurs ; 38(4): 373-381, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32552258

RESUMO

Background: Resilience is crucial for students in health schools as care becomes more complex and as the adjustment to meet patient, environmental, and professional demands with success can seem a daunting challenge. Self-care activities can support the development of resilience in the student population. The purpose of this study is to explore and describe self-care practices, health-promoting behaviors, and resilience among students, faculty, and staff of the health professional schools at a large metropolitan university. Method: This was a cross-sectional study of data from 148 participants. Analysis included descriptive statistics, t tests, analysis of variance, crosstabs, and Pearson correlations. Results: Resilience was lower among students than among faculty and staff. The most frequent self-care activities were humor and music. Resilience was significantly correlated with the self-care behaviors of praying (p = .006), healthy sleeping habits (p = .024), reading (p = .007), and mindful acceptance (p = .025); yoga and meditation were not significantly correlated with resilience.


Assuntos
Docentes/psicologia , Ocupações em Saúde/educação , Resiliência Psicológica , Autocuidado/métodos , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Docentes/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Ocupações em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Autocuidado/classificação , Autocuidado/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Texas
16.
Am J Ind Med ; 63(7): 624-633, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32236973

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers are occupationally exposed to various hazardous chemicals and agents that can potentially result in long-term adverse health effects. These exposures have not been comprehensively examined at a population level. The aim of this study was to examine occupational exposures to a wide range of asthmagens, carcinogens, and ototoxic agents among healthcare workers in Australia. METHODS: Data were collected as part of the Australian Work Exposures Studies, which were computer-assisted telephone surveys conducted in 2011, 2014, and 2016 to assess the prevalence of occupational exposures to carcinogens, asthmagens, and ototoxic agents, respectively, among Australian workers. Using data on healthcare workers, the prevalence of exposures to these agents was calculated and associations of demographic variables and occupation groups with exposure status were examined. RESULTS: The prevalence of exposure to at least one asthmagen, carcinogen, and ototoxic agent was 92.3%, 50.7%, and 44.6%, respectively. The most common exposures were to (a) cleaning and sterilizing agents in the asthmagen group; (b) shift work in the carcinogen group; and (c) toluene and p-xylene among ototoxic agents. Exposure varied by occupation, with exposure to carcinogens and ototoxic agents highest among personal carers and exposure to carcinogens most likely among nursing professionals and health and welfare support workers. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that a substantial proportion of Australian healthcare workers are occupationally exposed to asthmagens, carcinogens, and ototoxic agents. These exposures are more common among certain occupational groups. The information provided by this study will be useful in prioritizing and implementing control strategies.


Assuntos
Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/análise , Ocupações em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Adolescente , Adulto , Asma Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Asma Ocupacional/etiologia , Austrália/epidemiologia , Carcinógenos/análise , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Ototoxicidade/epidemiologia , Ototoxicidade/etiologia , Prevalência , Adulto Jovem
17.
Acad Med ; 95(7): 1026-1034, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32101919

RESUMO

Clear communication with patients upon emergency department (ED) discharge is important for patient safety during the transition to outpatient care. Over one-third of patients are discharged from the ED with diagnostic uncertainty, yet there is no established approach for effective discharge communication in this scenario. From 2017 to 2019, the authors developed the Uncertainty Communication Checklist for use in simulation-based training and assessment of emergency physician communication skills when discharging patients with diagnostic uncertainty. This development process followed the established 12-step Checklist Development Checklist framework and integrated patient feedback into 6 of the 12 steps. Patient input was included as it has potential to improve patient-centeredness of checklists related to assessment of clinical performance. Focus group patient participants from 2 clinical sites were included: Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, and Northwestern University Hospital, Chicago, Illinois.The authors developed a preliminary instrument based on existing checklists, clinical experience, literature review, and input from an expert panel comprising health care professionals and patient advocates. They then refined the instrument based on feedback from 2 waves of patient focus groups, resulting in a final 21-item checklist. The checklist items assess if uncertainty was addressed in each step of the discharge communication, including the following major categories: introduction, test results/ED summary, no/uncertain diagnosis, next steps/follow-up, home care, reasons to return, and general communication skills. Patient input influenced both what items were included and the wording of items in the final checklist. This patient-centered, systematic approach to checklist development is built upon the rigor of the Checklist Development Checklist and provides an illustration of how to integrate patient feedback into the design of assessment tools when appropriate.


Assuntos
Lista de Checagem/normas , Comunicação , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/normas , Adulto , Chicago/epidemiologia , Retroalimentação , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Ocupações em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Defesa do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Alta do Paciente , Segurança do Paciente , Philadelphia/epidemiologia , Habilidades Sociais , Cuidado Transicional , Incerteza
19.
Acta Pharm ; 70(2): 249-257, 2020 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31955142

RESUMO

Self-medication of children by their parents (SMCP) is an important public health issue as the effects and potential risks may be unpredictable. The objective of this first national Montenegrin study was to assess the prevalence of and factors influencing SMCP among schoolchildren. Data were obtained from a national representative sample of 4496 schoolchildren aged 7-13 years (50.4 % boys). Parents/caregivers completed a questionnaire concerning their demographic characteristics, socio-economic and cultural status, as well as the self-medication (SM) of their children. The association between SMCP and parents' socio-economic, demographic or cultural status was assessed by logistic regression analyses. The prevalence rate of SMCP was 24.6 %. Univariate logistic regression showed that maternal socio-demographic characteristics (educational level, employment status, health care profession and smoking habits) were relevant for SMCP. In a multiple logistic regression the independent effect /adjusted odds ratio (AOR) (95 % CI)/of maternal factors on SMCP remained for: education /2.23 (1.18-4.24)/, university-level vs. no education; profession /1.50 (1.07-3.00)/, health profession vs. non-health profession; and smoking habit /1.22 (1.04-1.42)/smokers vs. non-smokers. SMCP may be expected for every fourth child in Montenegro. Specific maternal factors that independently raise the probability of SMCP are higher education, health profession and smoking.


Assuntos
Fumar Cigarros/efeitos adversos , Ocupações em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Automedicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pais , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...